Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jamie Conrad's avatar

I appreciate Helen Manich flagging Dominion's role in this and Senator Ebbin's work to improve the situation. There is a strong argument that, as a regulated public utility, Dominion ought to be required to bear the interconnection cost (which it could then roll into its rate base and eventually recover from all of its customers). The environmentally (and climate)-friendly trend in this policy area has been toward promoting distributed power generation and net-metering -- i.e., toward promoting installation by electricity consumers of small solar (and other renewable) projects and allowing them to sell their power to the connected utility when they generate more power than they need. The utility companies of course hate this -- but we, the electorate, ought to be able to say "too bad!" With a Democratic governor, we might be able to get something even better than Senator Ebbin's bill enacted.

Expand full comment
Rod Fonda's avatar

As someone who has owned homes with rooftop solar in 3 different states, I can say with conviction that the mystical "powers that be"--particularly the power companies--try very hard to find obstacles to allowing independent solar to succeed. The result is a solar industry that is very fragmented and weak. It's a series of sad stories.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts