Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Conor's avatar

Is count 4 based exclusively on the fact that the relevant zoning districts are called "One-Family Dwelling Districts"? Are you of the opinion that if they were just called "Residential Districts" that the judge would have dismissed this count?

Additionally, is the "permit" required for EHO's (which were allowed by-right) referencing the administrative approvals? The order says "it is uncontradicted that a permit is required in order to build a EHO housing unit on a single-family zoned lot." Without having seen the language in the original ordinance, what "permit" was required if they were described as by-right?

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts